University of Leicester
Browse
Mendelian Randomisation study of the influence of eGFR on coronary heart disease.pdf (554.43 kB)

Mendelian Randomisation study of the influence of eGFR on coronary heart disease

Download (554.43 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-05-10, 13:55 authored by Pimphen Charoen, Dorothea Nitsch, Jorgen Engmann, Tina Shah, Jonathan White, Delilah Zabaneh, Barbara Jefferis, Goya Wannamethee, Peter Whincup, Amy Mulick Cassidy, Tom Gaunt, Ian Day, Stela McLachlan, Jacqueline Price, Meena Kumari, Mika Kivimaki, Eric Brunner, Claudia Langenberg, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Aroon Hingorani, John Whittaker, Juan Pablo Casas, Frank Dudbridge, UCLEB Consortium
Impaired kidney function, as measured by reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), has been associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in observational studies, but it is unclear whether this association is causal or the result of confounding or reverse causation. In this study we applied Mendelian randomisation analysis using 17 genetic variants previously associated with eGFR to investigate the causal role of kidney function on CHD. We used 13,145 participants from the UCL-LSHTM-Edinburgh-Bristol (UCLEB) Consortium and 194,427 participants from the Coronary ARtery DIsease Genome-wide Replication and Meta-analysis plus Coronary Artery Disease (CARDIoGRAMplusC4D) consortium. We observed significant association of an unweighted gene score with CHD risk (odds ratio = 0.983 per additional eGFR-increasing allele, 95% CI = 0.970-0.996, p = 0.008). However, using weights calculated from UCLEB, the gene score was not associated with disease risk (p = 0.11). These conflicting results could be explained by a single SNP, rs653178, which was not associated with eGFR in the UCLEB sample, but has known pleiotropic effects that prevent us from drawing a causal conclusion. The observational association between low eGFR and increased CHD risk was not explained by potential confounders, and there was no evidence of reverse causation, therefore leaving the remaining unexplained association as an open question.

History

Citation

Scientific Reports, 2016, 6, Article number: 28514

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Scientific Reports

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

eissn

2045-2322

Acceptance date

2016-06-06

Copyright date

2016

Available date

2017-05-10

Publisher version

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep28514

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC