posted on 2014-10-31, 16:10authored bySarah Marie Knight
Often, so-called juvenilia are read only to shed light on an author’s later
writing. The question of when the term “juvenilia” first comes to imply diminished
literary value—meaning “immature” and perhaps “premature,” as opposed to being
merely descriptive of the author’s age—is particularly relevant to a consideration of
Milton at university because of the teleological approach often taken to his early
works. Consequently, Milton’s
Prolusions, the seven orations he delivered as a Cam-bridge student between 1627 and 1632, have often tended to be strategically mined,
perceived as interesting only as precursors of what he went on to write. Besides a
frequently held prejudice against juvenilia, other factors related to literary form and
linguistic medium have also contributed to the relative neglect of the
Prolusions: the
academic oration is rightly seen as more ephemeral, self-referential, and rooted to its
institutional context than a political tract or epic poem, and Milton’s Latin works
tend to be less widely read than the vernacular writing. The orations themselves
often invoke a sense of earliness: throughout the
Prolusions, Milton carefully directs
his words at his university contemporaries, frequently stressing the limitations of his
own “sinews weak” and “endeavouring tongue” (“At a Vacation Exercise” 1-2), and
consistently implying that neither oration nor orator is quite yet formed. Even
the title,
Prolusiones, explicitly asserts origin: like its cognate “prelude,”
prolusio means a beginning, an initial foray. Yet in the words of the printer’s letter to the
1674 publication, “quantumvis juvenilia”—“although [perhaps ‘because’] they are juvenilia”—we need to consider the
Prolusions as significant texts in their own right.
History
Citation
Milton Quarterly, 2011, 45 (3), pp. 145-160
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF ARTS, HUMANITIES AND LAW/School of English