University of Leicester
Browse

Multi-Heuristic Strategy Choice: Response to Krueger

Download (24.71 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2013-06-27, 09:25 authored by Andrew M. Colman, Briony D. Pulford, C.L. Lawrence
Social projection cannot adequately explain coordination in common interest games, and nothing resembling social projection underlies team reasoning or strong Stackelberg reasoning. Although our experiments suggest that cognitive hierarchy Level-1 reasoning was most influential in the games that we investigated, strong Stackelberg reasoning and team reasoning were also used quite frequently by the players.

History

Citation

Decision, 2014, in press

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Psychology

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Decision

Publisher

American Psychological Association (APA)

issn

2325-9965

eissn

2325-9973

Copyright date

2014

Available date

2013-06-27

Publisher version

http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/dec/index.aspx

Notes

This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC