posted on 2013-06-27, 09:25authored byAndrew M. Colman, Briony D. Pulford, C.L. Lawrence
Social projection cannot adequately explain coordination in common interest games, and nothing resembling social projection underlies team reasoning or strong Stackelberg reasoning. Although our experiments suggest that cognitive hierarchy Level-1 reasoning was most influential in the games that we investigated, strong Stackelberg reasoning and team reasoning were also used quite frequently by the players.
History
Citation
Decision, 2014, in press
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Psychology
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
Decision
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
issn
2325-9965
eissn
2325-9973
Copyright date
2014
Available date
2013-06-27
Publisher version
http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/dec/index.aspx
Notes
This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.