University of Leicester
Browse

Multi-disciplinary Evaluation of Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs) for better Health (MESARCH): protocol for a 1-year cohort study examining health, well-being and cost outcomes in adult survivors of sexual assault attending SARCs in England

Download (3.51 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-02-06, 09:39 authored by Lorna O'Doherty, Grace Carter, Eleanor Lutman-White, Rachel Caswell, Louise J Jackson, Gene Feder, Jon Heron, Richard Morris, Katherine Brown

Introduction

Sexual violence is commonplace and has serious adverse consequences for physical and mental health. Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs) are viewed as a best practice response. Little is known about their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Long-term data on the health and well-being of those who have experienced rape and sexual assault are also lacking.

Methods and analysis

This is a mixed-methods protocol for a 1-year cohort study aiming to examine the health and well-being in survivors of sexual violence after attending a SARC in England. Quantitative measures are being taken at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Post-traumatic stress (PTS) is the primary outcome (target N=270 at 12-month follow-up). Secondary measures include anxiety, depression, substance use and sexual health and well-being. Using mixed-effects regression, our main analysis will examine whether variation in SARC service delivery and subsequent mental healthcare is associated with improvement in trauma symptoms after 12 months. An economic analysis will compare costs and outcomes associated with different organisational aspects of SARC service delivery and levels of satisfaction with care. A nested qualitative study will employ narrative analysis of transcribed interviews with 30 cohort participants and 20 survivors who have not experienced SARC services.

Ethics and dissemination

The research is supported by an independent study steering committee, data monitoring and ethics committee and patient and public involvement (PPI) group. A central guiding principle of the research is that being involved should feel diametrically opposed to being a victim of sexual violence, and be experienced as empowering and supportive. Our PPI representatives are instrumental in this, and our wider stakeholders encourage us to consider the health and well-being of all involved. We will disseminate widely through peer-reviewed articles and non-academic channels to maximise the impact of findings on commissioning of services and support for survivors.Trial registration numberISRCTN30846825.

Funding

Multi-disciplinary Evaluation of Sexual Assault Referral Centres for better Health (MESARCH)

NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre

Find out more...

History

Citation

O'Doherty L, Carter G, Lutman-White E, et alMulti-disciplinary Evaluation of Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs) for better Health (MESARCH): protocol for a 1-year cohort study examining health, well-being and cost outcomes in adult survivors of sexual assault attending SARCs in EnglandBMJ Open 2022;12:e057449. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057449

Author affiliation

College of Social Sci Arts and Humanities Criminology, Sociology & Social Policy

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ Open

Volume

12

Issue

5

Pagination

e057449 - e057449

Publisher

BMJ

issn

2044-6055

eissn

2044-6055

Acceptance date

2022-03-31

Copyright date

2022

Available date

2025-02-06

Language

en

Deposited by

Ms Emma Sleath

Deposit date

2024-10-18

Rights Retention Statement

  • No

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC