posted on 2019-09-16, 11:34authored byMatthew Tillotson
This article discusses an episode of natural boundary delimitation/demarcation
conducted between British and German imperial powers on the central African
Nyasa-Tanganyika plateau in the late 1890s. I situate vignettes on the boundary’s
delimitation in 1897-98 within broader processes of imperial territorialisation to
note that the boundary eventually produced on the plateau represented a fabrication
resolving tensions between its ‘natural’ sources. Specifically, I argue the boundary
was produced to mediate between a diplomatic nature, written in metropolitan
worlds by diplomats and cartographers, and a colonial nature, a zone of phenomenal
experiences, inhuman encounters and ‘sensation’ (Wark, 2016). I emphasise the
experience of technical practice to suggest that this itself represented a form of
imperial power, capable of challenging or ‘deferring’ (Bhabha, 2012) metropolitan
circuits of governance and knowledge production, not least by revealing the liveliness
of the material world undergoing imperial territorialisation. Sensation produced the
form of the writings and archives of survey-exploration: often confounded by
problems of their data and surroundings, commissioners made the epistemological
and subjective manoeuvrings through which they appeared to rise above their inert
surroundings to master them. But this does not characterise the experience of
fieldwork on the plateau, which was constituted by a panoply of technical situations
wherein delineations between objects, observers and their material settings were
indeterminable.
History
Citation
Political Geography, Volume 76, January 2020, 102081
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/School of Geography, Geology and the Environment
The file associated with this record is under embargo until 24 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.