University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

Neonatal mortality risk of large-for-gestational-age and macrosomic live births in 15 countries, including 115.6 million nationwide linked records, 2000–2020

Download (3.4 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-02-27, 09:53 authored by L Suárez-Idueta, EO Ohuma, CJ Chang, EA Hazel, J Yargawa, YB Okwaraji, E Bradley, A Gordon, J Sexton, HLS Lawford, ES Paixao, IR Falcão, S Lisonkova, Q Wen, P Velebil, J Jírová, E Horváth-Puhó, HT Sørensen, L Sakkeus, L Abuladze, KA Yunis, A Al Bizri, SL Alvarez, L Broeders, AE van Dijk, F Alyafei, M AlQubaisi, N Razaz, J Söderling, LK Smith, RJ Matthews, E Lowry, N Rowland, R Wood, K Monteath, I Pereyra, G Pravia, JE Lawn, H Blencowe

Objective: We aimed to compare the prevalence and neonatal mortality associated with large for gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia among 115.6 million live births in 15 countries, between 2000 and 2020. Design: Population-based, multi-country study. Setting: National healthcare systems. Population: Liveborn infants. Methods: We used individual-level data identified for the Vulnerable Newborn Measurement Collaboration. We calculated the prevalence and relative risk (RR) of neonatal mortality among live births born at term + LGA (>90th centile, and also >95th and >97th centiles when the data were available) versus term + appropriate for gestational age (AGA, 10th–90th centiles) and macrosomic (≥4000, ≥4500 and ≥5000 g, regardless of gestational age) versus 2500–3999 g. INTERGROWTH 21st served as the reference population. Main outcome measures: Prevalence and neonatal mortality risks. Results: Large for gestational age was common (median prevalence 18.2%; interquartile range, IQR, 13.5%–22.0%), and overall was associated with a lower neonatal mortality risk compared with AGA (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77–0.89). Around one in ten babies were ≥4000 g (median prevalence 9.6% (IQR 6.4%–13.3%), with 1.2% (IQR 0.7%–2.0%) ≥4500 g and with 0.2% (IQR 0.1%–0.2%) ≥5000 g). Overall, macrosomia of ≥4000 g was not associated with increased neonatal mortality risk (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.94); however, a higher risk was observed for birthweights of ≥4500 g (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.10–2.11) and ≥5000 g (RR 4.54, 95% CI 2.58–7.99), compared with birthweights of 2500–3999 g, with the highest risk observed in the first 7 days of life. Conclusions: In this population, birthweight of ≥4500 g was the most useful marker for early mortality risk in big babies and could be used to guide clinical management decisions.

Funding

Children's Investment Fund Foundation. Grant Number: 1803-02535

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences/Population Health Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Publisher

Wiley

issn

1470-0328

eissn

1471-0528

Copyright date

2023

Available date

2024-02-27

Spatial coverage

England

Language

eng

Deposited by

Professor Lucy Smith

Deposit date

2024-02-13

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC