University of Leicester
Browse

Nocturnal hemodialysis: an underutilized modality?

Download (337.74 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-04-25, 11:37 authored by JO Burton, MPM Graham-Brown
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is increasing evidence that extended-hours regimens are associated with improved outcomes for patients on maintenance hemodialysis programs. Home hemodialysis programs are a well established way for patients to benefit from extended-hours dialysis overnight; however, there are significant barriers to home hemodialysis, which means that for many this is not an option. In center, nocturnal hemodialysis is an increasingly recognized way of offering extended-hours treatment to patients unable to undertake home-based programs and is an underutilized modality for such patients to gain from the physiological benefits of extended-hours dialysis regimens. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent data suggest that nocturnal dialysis programs confer a significant survival advantage over both standard dialysis and short-daily dialysis regimens with evidence proposing that this is mediated through beneficial cardiovascular remodeling. Moreover, there is strong evidence that nocturnal dialysis regimens associate with significant improvements in quality-of-life measures and social well being. SUMMARY: Nocturnal hemodialysis is an underutilized way of offering extended-hours hemodialysis to patients in both the home and in-center environments. As the evidence base around nocturnal dialysis grows, clinicians and dialysis providers are becoming increasingly obliged to investigate implementation strategies for nocturnal dialysis services to improve patient outcomes and experience of care.

Funding

Dr Burton is supported through a National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist Fellowship (CS-2013-13-014).

History

Citation

Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, 2018, 27 (6), pp. 472-477

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension

Publisher

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins

eissn

1473-6543

Copyright date

2018

Publisher version

https://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=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

Notes

The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC