Noninvasive Detection of Activating Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1) Mutations in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
journal contribution
posted on 2015-05-07, 10:21authored byDavid S. Guttery, Karen Page, A. Hills, L. N. Woodley, S. D. Marchese, Basma Rghebi, Robert K. Hastings, Jinli Luo, J. Howard Pringle, J. Stebbing, R. C. Coombes, S. Ali, Jacqueline A. Shaw
Background: Activating mutations in the estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) gene are acquired on
treatment and can drive resistance to endocrine therapy. Due to the spatial and temporal
limitations of needle core biopsies, our goal was to develop a highly sensitive, less invasive
method of detecting activating ESR1 mutations via circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and
tumor cells as a “liquid biopsy”.
Methods: We developed a targeted 23 amplicon next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel for
detection of hotspot mutations in ESR1, PIK3CA, TP53, FGFR1 and FGFR2 in 48 patients with
ERα positive metastatic breast cancer who were receiving systemic therapy. Selected mutations
were validated using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR).
Results: Nine baseline cfDNA samples had an ESR1 mutation. NGS detected 3 activating
mutations in ESR1, 3 hotspot mutations in PIK3CA and 3 in TP53 in baseline cfDNA, and the
ESR1 p.D538G mutation in one matched circulating tumor cell sample. ddPCR analysis was
more sensitive than NGS and identified 6 additional baseline cfDNA samples with the ESR1
p.D538G mutation at a frequency of < 1%. In serial blood samples from 11 patients, 4 showed
changes in cfDNA, 2 with emergence of a mutation in ESR1. We also detected a low frequency
ESR1 mutation (1.3%) in cfDNA of one primary patient thought to have metastatic disease, but
was clear by scans.
Conclusion: Early identification of ESR1 mutations by liquid biopsy might allow for cessation
of ineffective endocrine therapies and switching to other treatments, without the need for tissue
biopsy and prior to the emergence of metastatic disease.
Funding
Supported by a Cancer Research UK Clinical and Translational Research Committee
programme award (C14315/A13462X), the Imperial and Leicester ECMCs and the Cancer
Research UK Leicester Centre.
History
Citation
Clinical Chemistry 2015, 61(7), 974–982
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine