posted on 2010-08-03, 14:53authored byKeith D.M. Snell
After earlier discussion by the Webbs, Dorothy Marshall, Hampson and
other Poor Law historians, the administration of parish settlement has
been rather neglected in recent years. And so one welcomes the recent
local study in this journal by Landau, 'The laws of settlement and the
surveillance of immigration in eighteenth-century Kent', as promoting
further exploration of a complex subject which was of some importance
to contemporaries.1 However, the characterization of pauper settlement in
her article seems ill-judged, and the emphasis in her outline of the nature
and purpose of settlement is misleading. To assess her arguments requires
discussion of some legalistic, logical and technical problems in her article
(and these may not engage all readers); but I shall also take her account
as a cue for pointing the way to a more balanced analysis of settlement,
which may be of wider interest.[Opening Paragraph]