University of Leicester
Browse

Payment Services, the Deplatforming of Sex, and the Governance of Platform Intimacy

journal contribution
posted on 2024-05-24, 10:46 authored by Stephanie Hill

Much of the considerable regulatory attention directed at sexual content online focuses on platform content moderation policies, but payment and advertising services play a gatekeeping role on platform content as well. In 2021, OnlyFans cited the difficulties of meeting the policies of payment processors and banks in its announcement that the site would stop hosting sexual content. This decision was subsequently retracted under public criticism of the platform for profiting off sex workers and then removing them from the platform. The case of OnlyFans provided a rare reversal of the moral panics that often surround the governance of sexual content online. This article discusses the deplatforming of sex as a case of contested platform governance identifies how public conflicts over platform governance of sexual content fit within broader “no platform” politics, and draws on research from affected communities to make the case for alternative policy approaches.

History

Author affiliation

College of Social Sci Arts and Humanities Arts

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies

Volume

48

Pagination

174 - 194

Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

issn

1206-0143

eissn

1916-0194

Copyright date

2024

Available date

2025-04-15

Language

en

Deposited by

Ms Steph Hill

Deposit date

2024-05-23

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC