University of Leicester
Browse

Pet-names and the OED

Download (298.14 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-10-10, 15:03 authored by Ben Parsons
IT has often been observed that the names given to pets and other animals show a striking level of fluidity, proving uniquely capable of drifting between the specific and the generic. Over time, when proper nouns are linked by convention to particular types of creature, they often broaden into general labels for that creature, coming to denote genders, breeds, or even entire species of animal. English contains several terms that have expanded in this way during their history: examples include such colloquial designations as ‘moggy’ or ‘dobbin’, compounds such as ‘jenny wren’ or ‘jackass’, and even terms that have managed to displace the original species name altogether, such as ‘robin’, which overtook the earlier ‘redbreast’ during the late sixteenth century. Nevertheless, it can often be difficult to identify the point at which an animal name has undergone this widening. For this reason, there are a number of instances where the OED assigns too late a date for the emergence of these curious terms. Some of these problematic entries are listed below, with a number of witnesses predating the earliest examples currently given in the dictionary. [Opening paragraph]

History

Citation

Notes and Queries, 2016, 63 (3), pp. 370-374

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/School of English

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Notes and Queries

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

issn

0029-3970

eissn

1471-6941

Acceptance date

2016-07-06

Copyright date

2016

Available date

2018-07-11

Publisher version

http://nq.oxfordjournals.org/content/63/3/370

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC