University of Leicester
Browse

Photolysis frequency measurement techniques: results of a comparison within the ACCENT project

Download (3.87 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-02-10, 11:18 authored by B. Bohn, Gary K. Corlett, M. Gillmann, S. Sanghavi, G. Stange, E. Tensing, M. Vrekoussis, W. J. Bloss, L. J. Clapp, M. Kortner, H-P. Dorn, Paul Steven Monks, U. Platt, C. Plass-Dulmer, N. Mihalopoulos, D. E. Heard, K. C. Clemitshaw, F. X. Meixner, A. S. H. Prevot, R. Schmitt
An intercomparison of different radiometric techniques measuring atmospheric photolysis frequencies j(NO2), j(HCHO) and j(O1D) was carried out in a two-week field campaign in June 2005 at Jülich, Germany. Three double-monochromator based spectroradiometers (DM-SR), three single-monochromator based spectroradiometers with diode-array detectors (SM-SR) and seventeen filter radiometers (FR) (ten j(NO2)-FR, seven j(O1D)-FR) took part in this comparison. For j(NO2), all spectroradiometer results agreed within ±3%. For j(HCHO), agreement was slightly poorer between −8% and +4% of the DM-SR reference result. For the SM-SR deviations were explained by poorer spectral resolutions and lower accuracies caused by decreased sensitivities of the photodiode arrays in a wavelength range below 350 nm. For j(O1D), the results were more complex within +8% and −4% with increasing deviations towards larger solar zenith angles for the SM-SR. The direction and the magnitude of the deviations were dependent on the technique of background determination. All j(NO2)-FR showed good linearity with single calibration factors being sufficient to convert from output voltages to j(NO2). Measurements were feasible until sunset and comparison with previous calibrations showed good long-term stability. For the j(O1D)-FR, conversion from output voltages to j(O1D) needed calibration factors and correction functions considering the influences of total ozone column and elevation of the sun. All instruments showed good linearity at photolysis frequencies exceeding about 10% of maximum values. At larger solar zenith angles, the agreement was non-uniform with deviations explainable by insufficient correction functions. Comparison with previous calibrations for some j(O1D)-FR indicated drifts of calibration factors.

History

Citation

Atmospheric Chemistry And Physics, 2008, 8 (17), pp. 5373-5391 (19)

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/Department of Physics and Astronomy

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Atmospheric Chemistry And Physics

Publisher

Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union

issn

1680-7316

eissn

1680-7324

Acceptance date

2008-08-19

Copyright date

2008

Available date

2016-02-10

Publisher version

http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/5373/2008/

Language

en