University of Leicester
Browse

Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study

Download (1.46 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-02-06, 13:36 authored by RA Evans, H McAuley, EM Harrison, A Shikotra, A Singapuri, M Sereno, O Elneima, AB Docherty, NI Lone, OC Leavy, L Daines, JK Baillie, JS Brown, T Chalder, A De Soyza, N Diar Bakerly, N Easom, JR Geddes, NJ Greening, N Hart, LG Heaney, S Heller, L Howard, JR Hurst, J Jacob, RG Jenkins, C Jolley, S Kerr, OM Kon, K Lewis, JM Lord, GP McCann, S Neubauer, PJM Openshaw, D Parekh, P Pfeffer, NM Rahman, B Raman, M Richardson, M Rowland, MG Semple, AM Shah, SJ Singh, A Sheikh, D Thomas, M Toshner, JD Chalmers, LP Ho, A Horsley, M Marks, K Poinasamy, LV Wain, CE Brightling, PHOSP-COVID collaborative group

Background: The impact of COVID-19 on physical and mental health and employment after hospitalisation with acute disease is not well understood. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of COVID-19-related hospitalisation on health and employment, to identify factors associated with recovery, and to describe recovery phenotypes. Methods: The Post-hospitalisation COVID-19 study (PHOSP-COVID) is a multicentre, long-term follow-up study of adults (aged ≥18 years) discharged from hospital in the UK with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, involving an assessment between 2 and 7 months after discharge, including detailed recording of symptoms, and physiological and biochemical testing. Multivariable logistic regression was done for the primary outcome of patient-perceived recovery, with age, sex, ethnicity, body-mass index, comorbidities, and severity of acute illness as covariates. A post-hoc cluster analysis of outcomes for breathlessness, fatigue, mental health, cognitive impairment, and physical performance was done using the clustering large applications k-medoids approach. The study is registered on the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN10980107). Findings: We report findings for 1077 patients discharged from hospital between March 5 and Nov 30, 2020, who underwent assessment at a median of 5·9 months (IQR 4·9–6·5) after discharge. Participants had a mean age of 58 years (SD 13); 384 (36%) were female, 710 (69%) were of white ethnicity, 288 (27%) had received mechanical ventilation, and 540 (50%) had at least two comorbidities. At follow-up, only 239 (29%) of 830 participants felt fully recovered, 158 (20%) of 806 had a new disability (assessed by the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning), and 124 (19%) of 641 experienced a health-related change in occupation. Factors associated with not recovering were female sex, middle age (40–59 years), two or more comorbidities, and more severe acute illness. The magnitude of the persistent health burden was substantial but only weakly associated with the severity of acute illness. Four clusters were identified with different severities of mental and physical health impairment (n=767): very severe (131 patients, 17%), severe (159, 21%), moderate along with cognitive impairment (127, 17%), and mild (350, 46%). Of the outcomes used in the cluster analysis, all were closely related except for cognitive impairment. Three (3%) of 113 patients in the very severe cluster, nine (7%) of 129 in the severe cluster, 36 (36%) of 99 in the moderate cluster, and 114 (43%) of 267 in the mild cluster reported feeling fully recovered. Persistently elevated serum C-reactive protein was positively associated with cluster severity. Interpretation: We identified factors related to not recovering after hospital admission with COVID-19 at 6 months after discharge (eg, female sex, middle age, two or more comorbidities, and more acute severe illness), and four different recovery phenotypes. The severity of physical and mental health impairments were closely related, whereas cognitive health impairments were independent. In clinical care, a proactive approach is needed across the acute severity spectrum, with interdisciplinary working, wide access to COVID-19 holistic clinical services, and the potential to stratify care. Funding: UK Research and Innovation and National Institute for Health Research.

History

Author affiliation

Institute for Lung Health, Leicester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

Volume

9

Issue

11

Pagination

1275 - 1287

Publisher

Elsevier

issn

2213-2600

eissn

2213-2619

Copyright date

2021

Available date

2024-02-06

Language

English

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC