University of Leicester
Browse

Planning for end of life in the past and present: Historical, legal, and clinical perspectives on ReSPECT

Download (597.96 kB)
Version 2 2025-03-20, 16:23
Version 1 2025-02-13, 10:22
journal contribution
posted on 2025-03-20, 16:23 authored by James Van Oppen, Sarah GunnSarah Gunn, Timothy Coats, Nataly Papadopoulou, Michaela Senkova, Sarah Tarlow, Elizabeth Wicks

The ReSPECT (‘Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment’) process

was developed in the UK to guide and document conversations and decision-making with

patients and their relatives around intervention during critical deterioration. This includes

advising whether resuscitation should be attempted when a person dies. Current medical

preparation for death is qualitatively different to social behaviours by people in the past and

presents some controversies when considering the legal status of death-related decisions. In

this paper, we discuss our interdisciplinary perspectives as archaeological, historical, legal,

medical, and clinical psychologist academics following an historico-medico-legal appraisal of

the ReSPECT process as situated in the current UK legal and cultural landscape. We review

controversies and conundrums, and contextualise and contrast the current position to

preparing for death and dying in the past.

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Psychology & Vision Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Publisher

Sage

Copyright date

2025

Available date

2025-02-13

Language

en

Deposited by

Dr Sarah Gunn

Deposit date

2025-02-04

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Keywords

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC