University of Leicester
Browse

Population characteristics, mechanisms of primary care and premature mortality in England : a cross-sectional study

Download (996.37 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-02-25, 13:47 authored by Richard Henry Baker, Kate Honeyford, Louis S. Levene, A. G. III Mainous, David R. Jones, M. J. Bankart, T. Stokes
OBJECTIVES: Health systems with strong primary care tend to have better population outcomes, but in many countries demand for care is growing. We sought to identify mechanisms of primary care that influence premature mortality. DESIGN: We developed a conceptual model of the mechanisms by which primary care influences premature mortality, and undertook a cross-sectional study in which population and primary care variables reflecting the model were used to explain variations in mortality of those aged under 75 years. The premature standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) for each practice, available from the Department of Health, had been calculated from numbers of deaths in the 5 years from 2006 to 2010. A regression model was undertaken with explanatory variables for the year 2009/2010, and repeated to check stability using data for 2008/2009 and 2010/2011. SETTING: All general practices in England were eligible for inclusion and, of the total of 8290, complete data were available for 7858. RESULTS: Population variables, particularly deprivation, were the most powerful predictors of premature mortality, but the mechanisms of primary care depicted in our model also affected mortality. The number of GPs/1000 population and detection of hypertension were negatively associated with mortality. In less deprived practices, continuity of care was also negatively associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Greater supply of primary care is associated with lower premature mortality even in a health system that has strong primary care (England). Health systems need to sustain the capacity of primary care to deliver effective care, and should assist primary care providers in identifying and meeting the needs of socioeconomically deprived groups.

History

Citation

BMJ Open, 2016, 6 (2), e009981

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ Open

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

eissn

2044-6055

Acceptance date

2015-12-31

Copyright date

2016

Available date

2016-02-25

Publisher version

http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/2/e009981

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC