posted on 2015-03-23, 16:52authored byGraham P. Martin, Natalie Armstrong, Emma-Louise Aveling, Georgia Herbert, Mary Dixon-Woods
Recent decades have seen the influence of the professions decline. Lately, commentators have suggested a revived role for a ‘new’ professionalism in ensuring and enhancing high-quality healthcare in systems dominated by market and managerial logics. The form this new professionalism might take, however, remains obscure. This article uses data from an ethnographic study of three English healthcare-improvement projects to analyze the place, potential, and limitations of professionalism as a means of engaging clinicians in efforts to improve service quality. We found that appeals to notions of professionalism had strong support among practitioners, but converting enthusiasm for the principle of professionalism into motivation to change practice was not straightforward. Some tactics used in pursuit of this deviated sharply from traditional models of collegial social control. In systems characterized by fissures between professional groups and powerful market and managerial influences, we suggest that professionalism must interact creatively but carefully with other logics.
Funding
This study was funded by the Health Foundation. Mary Dixon-Woods’ contribution to the writing of this paper supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator award (reference WT097899MA) and by University of Leicester study leave at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, New Hampshire.
History
Citation
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Publisher
American Sociological Association, SAGE Publications