posted on 2015-04-21, 13:38authored byMatthew F. Yuyun, Hafid K. Narayan, Paulene A. Quinn, J. Struck, A. Bergmann, O. Hartmann, Leong L. Ng
We undertook this systematic review to determine the prognostic significance of adrenomedullin (ADM) in patients with heart failure and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Given the difficulty in measuring mature ADM, its surrogate, midregional proadrenomedullin (MRproADM) has been used in most studies. Systematic search of original published studies through MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration databases restricted to reports in English from January 1, 1993, to June 30, 2014, in humans was undertaken. Heterogeneity of studies prohibited a meta-analysis. In patients with heart failure, the area under the curve for prediction of mortality by MRproADM ranged from 0.68 to 0.81 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.63 to 0.91) across studies. One nmol/l increase in MRproADM was associated with hazard ratios (HRs) ranging from 1.77 to 2.79 (95% CI 1.29 to 5.95) for death in patients with heart failure. In patients with AMI, the area under the curve for MRproADM predicting MACE ranged from 0.64 to 0.80 (CI 0.51 to 0.87) across studies and death 0.79 to 0.84 (CI 0.73 to 0.90). One nmol/l increase in MRproADM was associated with HR for MACE ranging from 1.78 to 4.10 (CI 1.20 to 10.12), whereas log10 of MRproADM had HRs of 3.63 to 9.75 (CI 1.48 to 26.16) for MACE and 4.86 to 16.68 (CI 4.56 to 60.99) for death across studies in patients with AMI. In conclusion, adrenomedullin is an independent predictor of death in patients with heart failure and of MACE and death in patients who have suffered an AMI. Quantification of this peptide might contribute to improved risk stratification in settings of heart failure and myocardial infarction.
History
Citation
American Journal of Cardiology, 2015, 115 (7), pp. 986-991
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Cardiovascular Sciences
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in American Journal of Cardiology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in American Journal of Cardiology, Volume 115, Issue 7, (1 April 2015) DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.027