University of Leicester
Browse

Protocol for a realist evaluation of Recovery College dementia courses: understanding coproduction through ethnography

Download (461.07 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-05-02, 09:24 authored by Linda Birt, Juniper West, Fiona Poland, Geoff Wong, Melanie Handley, Rachael Litherland, Corinna Hackmann, Esme Moniz-Cook, Emma Wolverson, Bonnie Teague, Ruth Mills, Kathryn Sams, Claire Duddy, Chris Fox
IntroductionSupport following a dementia diagnosis in the UK is variable. Attending a Recovery College course with and for people with dementia, their supporters and healthcare professionals (staff), may enable people to explore and enact ways to live well with dementia. Recovery Colleges are established within mental health services worldwide, offering peer-supported short courses coproduced in partnership between staff and people with lived experience of mental illness. The concept of recovery is challenging in dementia narratives, with little evidence of how the Recovery College model could work as a method of postdiagnostic dementia support.Methods and analysisUsing a realist evaluation approach, this research will examine and define what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why, in Recovery College dementia courses. The ethnographic study will recruit five case studies from National Health Service Mental Health Trusts across England. Sampling will seek diversity in new or long-standing courses, delivery methods and demographics of population served. Participant observations will examine course coproduction. Interviews will be undertaken with people with dementia, family and friend supporters and staff involved in coproducing and commissioning the courses, as well as people attending. Documentary materials will be reviewed. Analysis will use a realist logic of analysis to develop a programme theory containing causal explanations for outcomes, in the form of context-mechanism-outcome-configurations, at play in each case.Ethics and disseminationThe study received approval from Coventry & Warwickshire Research Ethics Committee (22/WM/0215). Ethical concerns include not privileging any voice, consent for embedded observational fieldwork with people who may experience fluctuating mental capacity and balancing researcher ‘embedded participant’ roles in publicly accessible learning events. Drawing on the realist programme theory, two stakeholder groups, one people living with dementia and one staff will work with researchers to coproduce resources to support coproducing Recovery College dementia courses aligned with postdiagnostic services.

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences/Healthcare

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ Open

Volume

13

Issue

12

Pagination

e078248

Publisher

BMJ

issn

2044-6055

eissn

2044-6055

Copyright date

2023

Available date

2024-05-02

Spatial coverage

England

Language

en

Deposited by

Dr Linda Birt

Deposit date

2024-04-28

Rights Retention Statement

  • No

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC