Reason: 12 month embargo on AAM - requested from author
Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Adults with Chronic Respiratory Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline
journal contribution
posted on 2023-12-21, 09:34authored byCL Rochester, JA Alison, B Carlin, AR Jenkins, NS Cox, G Bauldoff, SP Bhatt, J Bourbeau, C Burtin, PG Camp, TM Cascino, GA Dorney Koppel, C Garvey, R Goldstein, D Harris, L Houchen-Wolloff, T Limberg, PK Lindenauer, ML Moy, CJ Ryerson, SJ Singh, M Steiner, RS Tappan, AM Yohannes, AE Holland
Background: Despite the known benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for patients with chronic respiratory disease, this treatment is underused. Evidence-based guidelines should lead to greater knowledge of the proven benefits of PR, highlight the role of PR in evidence-based health care, and in turn foster referrals to and more effective delivery of PR for people with chronic respiratory disease. Methods: The multidisciplinary panel formulated six research questions addressing PR for specific patient groups (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], interstitial lung disease, and pulmonary hypertension) and models for PR delivery (telerehabilitation, maintenance PR). Treatment effects were quantified using systematic reviews. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to formulate clinical recommendations. Recommendations: The panel made the following judgments: strong recommendations for PR for adults with stable COPD (moderate-quality evidence) and after hospitalization for COPD exacerbation (moderate-quality evidence), strong recommendation for PR for adults with interstitial lung disease (moderate-quality evidence), conditional recommendation for PR for adults with pulmonary hypertension (low-quality evidence), strong recommendation for offering the choice of center-based PR or telerehabilitation for patients with chronic respiratory disease (moderate-quality evidence), and conditional recommendation for offering either supervised maintenance PR or usual care after initial PR for adults with COPD (low-quality evidence). Conclusions: These guidelines provide the basis for evidence-based delivery of PR for people with chronic respiratory disease.
History
Author affiliation
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine