Futter-Williams.Questioning the Holy Nuclear Trinity.pdf (398.26 kB)
Questioning the Holy Trinity: why the US nuclear triad still makes sense
journal contribution
posted on 2015-10-21, 10:54 authored by Andrew J. Futter, Heather W. WilliamsDespite renewed enthusiasm for nuclear disarmament, a contemporary security environment far removed from
that of the Cold War, and increasing budgetary pressures at home, US interests continue to be best served by
retaining a triad of nuclear forces. While options for a reduced force structure may appear to offer short-term
political and economic expediency, in the long run a three-legged deterrent - possibly consisting of less delivery
vehicles, operational warheads and even potentially de-alerted forces - represents the best way to balance the
competing requirements of contemporary and future US nuclear policy. Indeed, it may be that retaining the triad
provides the most realistic method of re-establishing US-Russia strategic stability, and the most credible basis for
advancing the drive for global nuclear reductions, strengthening global nuclear security, and even working
towards nuclear abolition.
History
Citation
Comparative Strategy, 2016, 35 (4), pp. 246-259Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/Department of Politics and International RelationsVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
Comparative StrategyPublisher
Taylor & Francis (Routledge)issn
0149-5933eissn
1521-0448Acceptance date
2015-10-12Copyright date
2016Available date
2018-05-02Publisher DOI
Publisher version
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ucst20/currentNotes
The file associated with this record is under an 18 month embargo from publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.Language
enAdministrator link
Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC