posted on 2009-04-20, 14:14authored byKeng-Leong Ang, Derek Chin, Francisco Leyva, Paul Foley, Chandrashekhar Kubal, Shajil Chalil, Lakshmi Srinivasan, Lizelle Bernhardt, Suzanne Stevens, Lincoln T. Shenje, Manuel Galiñanes
Introduction
Previous studies on the transplantation of autologous bone marrow cells (BMC) in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease have focused on their effects on viable, peri-infarct tissue. We conducted a blinded, randomized controlled study to investigate whether intramuscular (IM) or intracoronary (IC) administration of BMC into non-viable scarred myocardium during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves contractile function of scar segments compared with CABG alone.
Methods
63 elective CABG patients, with established myocardial scars diagnosed by dobutamine
stress echocardiography (DSE) and confirmed at surgery, were randomized into control, IM
or IC treatment groups. The BMC obtained at the time of surgery were injected into the middepth of the scar in the IM group or via the graft conduit supplying the scar in the IC group. Contractile function of the scar segments was assessed by DSE before and 6 months after treatment. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was also performed in the last 33 patients at the same time points.
Results
12.5-29.4% of patients showed improved wall motion in at least one scar segment after BMC
treatment but this effect was similar to that in the control group. Quantitatively, %systolic fractional thickening in scar segments did not improve with BMC administration. Scar transmurality, %infarct volume, left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions were also not improved by BMC.
Discussion
Autologous BMC, injected directly into the scar or the artery supplying the scar, do not
improve contractility of non-viable scarred myocardium. Furthermore, BMC do not reduce
scar size nor improve left ventricular function.
History
Citation
Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine, 2008, 5 (10), pp. 663-670.