posted on 2015-12-03, 14:29authored byC. S. Anderson, E. Heeley, Y. Huang, J. Wang, C. Stapf, C. Delcourt, R. Lindley, T. Robinson, P. Lavados, B. Neal, J. Hata, H. Arima, M. Parsons, Y. Li, S. Heritier, Q. Li, M. Woodward, R. J. Simes, S. M. Davis, J. Chalmers
Background
Whether rapid lowering of elevated blood pressure would improve the outcome in
patients with intracerebral hemorrhage is not known.
Methods
We randomly assigned 2839 patients who had had a spontaneous intracerebral
hemorrhage within the previous 6 hours and who had elevated systolic blood pressure
to receive intensive treatment to lower their blood pressure (with a target systolic
level of <140 mm Hg within 1 hour) or guideline-recommended treatment (with a
target systolic level of <180 mm Hg) with the use of agents of the physician’s choosing.
The primary outcome was death or major disability, which was defined as a score
of 3 to 6 on the modified Rankin scale (in which a score of 0 indicates no symptoms,
a score of 5 indicates severe disability, and a score of 6 indicates death) at 90 days.
A prespecified ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin score was also performed.
The rate of serious adverse events was compared between the two groups.
Results
Among the 2794 participants for whom the primary outcome could be determined,
719 of 1382 participants (52.0%) receiving intensive treatment, as compared with
785 of 1412 (55.6%) receiving guideline-recommended treatment, had a primary
outcome event (odds ratio with intensive treatment, 0.87; 95% confidence interval
[CI], 0.75 to 1.01; P=0.06). The ordinal analysis showed significantly lower modified
Rankin scores with intensive treatment (odds ratio for greater disability, 0.87;
95% CI, 0.77 to 1.00; P=0.04). Mortality was 11.9% in the group receiving intensive
treatment and 12.0% in the group receiving guideline-recommended treatment.
Nonfatal serious adverse events occurred in 23.3% and 23.6% of the patients in the
two groups, respectively.
Conclusions
In patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, intensive lowering of blood pressure
did not result in a significant reduction in the rate of the primary outcome of
death or severe disability. An ordinal analysis of modified Rankin scores indicated
improved functional outcomes with intensive lowering of blood pressure.
(Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia;
INTERACT2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00716079.)
History
Citation
New England Journal of Medicine 2013; 368:2355-2365
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine 2013; 368:2355-2365