University of Leicester
Browse

Regressions Fit for Purpose: Models of Locust Phase State Must Not Conflate Morphology With Behavior

Download (634.49 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-03-20, 11:24 authored by Swidbert R. Ott
Phenotypic plasticity often entails coordinated changes in multiple traits. The effects of two alternative environments on multiple phenotypic traits can be analyzed by multivariable binary logistic regression (LR). Locusts are grasshopper species (family Acrididae) with a capacity to transform between two distinct integrated phenotypes or “phases” in response to changes in population density: a solitarious phase, which occurs when densities are low, and a gregarious phase, which arises as a consequence of crowding and can form very large and economically damaging swarms. The two phases differ in behavior, physiology and morphology. A large body of work on the mechanistic basis of behavioral phase transitions has relied on LR models to estimate the probability of behavioral gregariousness from multiple behavioral variables. Martín-Blázquez and Bakkali (2017; doi: 10.1111/eea.12564) have recently proposed standardized LR models for estimating an overall “gregariousness level” from a combination of behavioral and, unusually, morphometric variables. Here I develop a detailed argument to demonstrate that the premise of such an overall “gregariousness level” is fundamentally flawed, since locust phase transformations entail a decoupling of behavior and morphology. LR models that combine phenotypic traits with markedly different response times to environmental change are of very limited value for analyses of phase change in locusts, and of environmentally induced phenotypic transitions in general. I furthermore show why behavioral variables should not be adjusted by measures of body size that themselves differ between the two phases. I discuss the models fitted by Martín-Blázquez and Bakkali (2017) to highlight potential pitfalls in statistical methodology that must be avoided when analysing associations between complex phenotypes and alternative environments. Finally, I reject the idea that “standardized models” provide a valid shortcut to estimating phase state across different developmental stages, strains or species. The points addressed here are pertinent to any research on transitions between complex phenotypes and behavioral syndromes

Funding

This work was supported by research grant BB/L02389X/1 to SO from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), UK.

History

Citation

Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2018, 12:137.

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Biological Sciences/Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Publisher

Frontiers Media

issn

1662-5153

Acceptance date

2018-06-15

Copyright date

2018

Available date

2019-03-20

Publisher version

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00137/full

Notes

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00137/full#supplementary-material All analyses are documented in the Supplementary Material of the present paper, which includes a report in PDF format and the .Rmd source code that generates the report reproducibly from the raw data of Mart́ın-Blázquez and Bakkali (2017).

Language

en