University of Leicester
Browse

Relationship between baseline physical activity assessed by pedometer count and new-onset diabetes in the NAVIGATOR trial.

Download (268.95 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-07-08, 08:46 authored by WE Kraus, T Yates, J Tuomilehto, J-L Sun, L Thomas, JJV McMurray, MA Bethel, RR Holman
Objective: Physical activity is related to clinical outcomes, even after adjusting for body mass, but is rarely assessed in randomized clinical trials. Research design and methods: We conducted an observational analysis of data from the Nateglinide and Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research trial, in which a total of 9306 people from 40 countries with impaired glucose tolerance and either cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors were randomized to receive nateglinide or placebo, in a 2-by-2 factorial design with valsartan or placebo. All were asked to also participate in a detailed lifestyle modification programme and followed-up for a median of 6.4 years with progression to diabetes as a co-primary end point. Seven-day ambulatory activity was assessed at baseline using research-grade pedometers. We assessed whether the baseline amount of physical activity was related to subsequent development of diabetes in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. Results: Pedometer data were obtained on 7118 participants and 35.0% developed diabetes. In an unadjusted analysis each 2000-step increment in the average number of daily steps, up to 10 000, was associated with a 5.5% lower risk of progression to diabetes (HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.92 to 0.97), with >6% relative risk reduction after adjustment. Conclusions: Physical activity should be measured objectively in pharmacologic trials as it is a significant but underappreciated contributor to diabetes outcomes. It should be a regular part of clinical practice as well.

Funding

The NAVIGATOR study was supported by Novartis, Inc. TY is supported by the NIHR Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit, Leicester, UK. WEK was supported by NIDDK/NIA grant DK081559 for purposes of this project.

History

Citation

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care 2018;6:e000523.

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Diabetes Research Centre

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care 2018;6:e000523.

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

issn

2052-4897

Acceptance date

2018-06-27

Copyright date

2018

Available date

2019-07-08

Publisher version

https://drc.bmj.com/content/6/1/e000523

Notes

The data contained in this manuscript are held at the Duke Clinical Research Institute.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC