University of Leicester
Browse

Remembering and forgetting Confederate monuments: taking the bitter with the sweet

Download (2.24 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2022-07-15, 13:36 authored by Stacy Boldrick, Richard Clay, Michelle Duster, Keith Magee
This article addresses contemporary and long-standing debates over Confederate monuments in the United States by examining the removal of two monuments in Memphis, Tennessee, one dedicated to Nathan Bedford Forrest (1821-77), and the other to Jefferson Davis (1808-89). A review of the rationales behind the origins of the Memphis monuments as objects of commemoration and the longer histories of their sites reveals the troubled nature of these symbols of white supremacy in the events leading to their eventual removal in 2017. It references the alignment of their production with two spikes in Confederate monument production between 1896 and 1919 and 1954 and 1968, during periods of segregation and political nostalgia. The study of the Memphis monuments and the fragility of their historic narratives segues into broader discussions around the analysis of Confederate monuments to propose that although forgetting may lie behind their longevity, remembering is critical to their future interpretation. Such discussions resonate beyond the subject of Southern US Confederate monuments, as part of wider international debates around contested monuments and responses to them.

History

Author affiliation

School of Museum Studies, University of Leicester

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Sculpture Journal: Volume 31, Issue 1

Volume

31

Issue

1

Pagination

9 - 22

Publisher

Liverpool University Press

issn

1366-2724

eissn

1756-9923

Copyright date

2022

Available date

2022-07-15

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC