University of Leicester
Browse

Reporting individual surgeon outcomes does not lead to risk aversion in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

Download (157.5 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-02-23, 12:19 authored by Athanasios Saratzis, A. Thatcher, M. F. Bath, David A. Sidloff, Matthew J. Bown, J. Shakespeare, Robert D. Sayers, C. Imray
INTRODUCTION: Reporting surgeons' outcomes has recently been introduced in the UK. This has the potential to result in surgeons becoming risk averse. The aim of this study was to investigate whether reporting outcomes for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery impacts on the number and risk profile (level of fitness) of patients offered elective treatment. METHODS: Publically available National Vascular Registry data were used to compare the number of AAAs treated in those centres across the UK that reported outcomes for the periods 2008-2012, 2009-2013 and 2010-2014. Furthermore, the number and characteristics of patients referred for consideration of elective AAA repair at a single tertiary unit were analysed yearly between 2010 and 2014. Clinic, casualty and theatre event codes were searched to obtain all AAAs treated. The results of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) were assessed. RESULTS: For the 85 centres that reported outcomes in all three five-year periods, the median number of AAAs treated per unit increased between the periods 2008-2012 and 2010-2014 from 192 to 214 per year (p=0.006). In the single centre cohort study, the proportion of patients offered elective AAA repair increased from 74% in 2009-2010 to 81% in 2013-2014, with a maximum of 84% in 2012-2013. The age, aneurysm size and CPET results (anaerobic threshold levels) for those eventually offered elective treatment did not differ significantly between 2010 and 2014. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not support the assumption that reporting individual surgeon outcomes is associated with a risk averse strategy regarding patient selection in aneurysm surgery at present.

History

Citation

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2017, 99 (2), pp. 161-165

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Cardiovascular Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

Publisher

Royal College of Surgeons of England

issn

0035-8843

eissn

1478-7083

Copyright date

2017

Available date

2018-02-23

Publisher version

https://publishing.rcseng.ac.uk/doi/10.1308/rcsann.2017.0005

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC