University of Leicester
Browse

Reporting of surrogate endpoints in randomised controlled trial reports (CONSORT-Surrogate): extension checklist with explanation and elaboration

Download (321.72 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-07-29, 15:43 authored by Anthony Muchai Manyara, Philippa Davies, Derek Stewart, Christopher J Weir, Amber E Young, Jane Blazeby, Nancy J Butcher, Sylwia Bujkiewicz, An-Wen Chan, Dalia Dawoud, Martin Offringa, Mario Ouwens, Asbjørn Hróbjartssson, Alain Amstutz, Luca Bertolaccini, Vito Domenico Bruno, Declan Devane, Christina DCM Faria, Peter B Gilbert, Ray Harris, Marissa Lassere, Lucio Marinelli, Sarah Markham, John H Powers, Yousef Rezaei, Laura Richert, Falk Schwendicke, Larisa G Tereshchenko, Achilles Thoma, Alparslan Turan, Andrew Worrall, Robin Christensen, Gary S Collins, Joseph S Ross, Rod S Taylor, Oriana Ciani

Randomised controlled trials commonly use surrogate endpoints to substitute for a target outcome (outcome of direct interest and relevance to trial participants, clinicians, and other stakeholders—eg, all cause mortality) to improve their efficiency (through shorter trial duration, reduced sample size, and thus lower research costs), or for ethical or practical reasons. But reliance on surrogate endpoints can increase the uncertainty of an intervention’s treatment effect and potential failure to provide adequate information on intervention harms, which has led to calls for improved reporting of trials using surrogate endpoints. This report presents a consensus driven reporting guideline for trials using surrogate endpoints as the primary outcomes—the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extension checklist: CONSORT-Surrogate. The extension includes nine items modified from the CONSORT 2010 checklist and two new items. Examples and explanations for each item are provided. We recommend that all stakeholders (including trial investigators and sponsors, journal editors and peer reviewers, research ethics reviewers, and funders) use this extension in reporting trial reports using surrogate endpoints. Use of this checklist will improve transparency, interpretation, and usefulness of trial findings, and ultimately reduce research waste.

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Population Health Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ

Volume

386

Pagination

e078524

Publisher

BMJ

issn

0959-8138

eissn

1756-1833

Copyright date

2024

Available date

2024-07-29

Spatial coverage

England

Language

en

Deposited by

Professor Sylwia Bujkiewicz

Deposit date

2024-07-18

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC