University of Leicester
Browse

Research Priorities for the Most Premature Babies Born <25 Weeks’ Gestation: Results of an International Priority Setting Partnership

Download (627.99 kB)
Version 2 2025-03-20, 16:24
Version 1 2025-02-13, 14:22
journal contribution
posted on 2025-03-20, 16:24 authored by S Peart, O Ray, L Galletta, A Bates, RA Boland, PG Davis, C Gale, Samantha JohnsonSamantha Johnson, S Kinsella, M Knight, LS Owen, L Pallot, TM Prentice, P Santhanadass, K Stanbury, DG Tingay, CL Whitehead, BJ Manley, CC Roehr, P Hardy

Objective The James Lind Alliance (JLA) Most Premature Babies Priority Setting Partnership aimed to identify the most important areas for research for infants born <25 weeks’ gestation.


Design Employing standardised JLA methodology, questions for research were sought from stakeholders via an online survey. Summary questions were formed and checked against existing evidence, with unanswered questions compiled into a second shortlisting survey for prioritisation by stakeholders. A stakeholder consensus workshop was held to determine the top 10 research priorities.


Participants People with lived experience of neonatal intensive care, including parents/carers of preterm infants and adults born preterm, and healthcare professionals caring for preterm infants across Australia, New Zealand and the UK.


Main outcome measure The top 10 research priorities for infants born <25 weeks’ gestation.


Results From 844 questions received from the initial survey, 81 summary questions were formed, of which 80 were unanswered and included in the second shortlisting survey. The 19 top-ranked questions were taken to the final prioritisation workshop, where the top 10 research priorities were determined by people with lived experience and healthcare professionals. The most important research question identified was ‘What can be done in the neonatal intensive care unit to improve long-term health and developmental outcomes?’. Other important areas for research included antenatal interventions and neonatal care at birth, preventing intraventricular haemorrhages, managing pain, postnatal corticosteroid treatment and supporting families.


Conclusions This study identified the most important areas of research for infants born <25 weeks’ gestation, as determined jointly by stakeholders. These findings should be used to guide future research and funding aimed at improving meaningful outcomes for these infants and their families.


History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Population Health Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Archives of Disease in Childhood

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

issn

0003-9888

eissn

1468-2044

Copyright date

2025

Available date

2025-03-20

Language

en

Deposited by

Professor Samantha Johnson

Deposit date

2025-02-06

Data Access Statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. All data, including raw data used for all figures and analysis, are available upon request to the corresponding author from 3 months following article publication to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, with approval by an independent review committee ('learned intermediary'). Proposals should be directed to stacey.peart@thewomens.org.au. Data requestors will need to sign a data access or material transfer agreement approved by MCRI.

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC