posted on 2018-01-09, 11:25authored byMichelle Murphy, Kate Z. Peters, Bethany S. Denton, Kathryn A. Lee, Heramb Chadchankar, James E. McCutcheon
The mechanisms by which intake of dietary protein is regulated are poorly understood despite their potential involvement in determining food choice and appetite. In particular, it is unclear whether protein deficiency results in a specific appetite for protein and whether influences on diet are immediate or develop over time. To determine the effects of protein restriction on consumption, preference, and palatability for protein we assessed patterns of intake for casein (protein) and maltodextrin (carbohydrate) solutions in adult rats. To induce a state of protein restriction, rats were maintained on a low protein diet (5% casein) and compared to control rats on non-restricted diet (20% casein). Under these dietary conditions, relative to control rats, protein-restricted rats exhibited hyperphagia without weight gain. After two weeks, on alternate conditioning days, rats were given access to either isocaloric casein or maltodextrin solutions that were saccharin-sweetened and distinctly flavored whilst consumption and licking patterns were recorded. This allowed rats to learn about the post-ingestive nutritional consequences of the two different solutions. Subsequently, during a preference test when rats had access to both solutions, we found that protein-restricted rats exhibited a preference for casein over carbohydrate whereas non-restricted rats did not. Analysis of lick microstructure revealed that this preference was associated with an increase in cluster size and number, reflective of an increase in palatability. In conclusion, protein-restriction induced a conditioned preference for protein, relative to carbohydrate, and this was associated with increased palatability.
Funding
Funding: This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [grant # BB/M007391/1]; and the European Commission [grant # GA 631404].
History
Citation
Physiology and Behavior, 2018, 184, pp. 235-241
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Biological Sciences/Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
Physiology and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier for International Behavioral Neuroscience Society [
All raw data files will be published with this manuscript alongside the Python scripts used to perform analysis. These are deposited on Github (https://github.com/jaimemcc/murphy-2017) and Mendeley Data (doi:10.17632/wgd83v3ntb.1).