Butler - British Penal Reform - 2nd revised draft - 9 June 15.docx (688.3 kB)
DOCUMENT
Butler - British Penal Reform - 2nd revised draft - 9 June 15.pdf (930.09 kB)
1/0
2 files
Rethinking the origins of the British Prisons Act of 1835: Ireland and the development and planning of prisons throughout the ‘four nations’ of the United Kingdom, 1820-35
posted on 2015-10-30, 15:44authored byRichard J. Butler
British Penal Reform
1
Re
thinking
the origins o
f the
British Prisons Act
of 1835
:
Ireland and the
development of
central
-
government
prison
inspection,
1820
-
35
1
Second revised manuscript, 9
June
2015
Abstract
While t
he introduction of c
entral
-
government inspectors for
prisons in
a
British
a
ct of 1835
has
been seen as a key Whig achievement of the
1830s
, alongside the new factory and poor
-
law
inspect
orates,
the Irish precedent enacted by Charles Grant, a
liberal Tory
chief secretary,
in the
early 1820s has gone unnoticed by
scholars.
The essay sets out t
o trace the Irish prefiguring
of
this
later
reforming measure
and in the process to
consider
prison reform in the United
Kingdom
in the early nineteenth century in a transnational manne
r in line with recent
scholarship
that has stressed the many
connectio
ns between social reforms in the four nations of
the British Isles
.
A new analysis of the critical
years
between 1823 and 18
35 in both
Britain and
Ireland
based on
a
detailed examination
of p
arliamentary inquiries and l
egislation
will show
how
developments in the two countries
overlapped and
how
reforms in one jurisdiction affected the
other. This essay explores the channels through which this exchange of knowledge and ideas
occurred both
in parliament and through voluntary
philanthropic
societies such as the
Association for the Improvement of Prisons and of Prison Discipline in Ireland
and its sister
organisation in British. In doing so this
essay
highlights
inadequacies with the
theory s
upported
by some scholars that Ireland functioned as
a laboratory for British social reform
at this time,
and instead
suggests
a more fluid exchange of ideas in both directions.
History
Citation
Historical Journal, 2016, 59 (3), pp. 721-746
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/School of History