University of Leicester
Browse

Risk assessment for people living with dementia: a systematic review

journal contribution
posted on 2024-01-05, 15:06 authored by Juanita Hoe, Elena Profyri, Charlotte Kemp, Monica Manela, Lucy Webster, Justine Anthony, Sergi Costafreda, Frank Arrojo, Helen Souris, Gill Livingston

Objective: This systematic review identified key components of risk assessment for people with dementia, examined attitudes toward risk identification and risk assessment, and appraised existing risk assessment tools. Methods: Systematic searches of five databases on two platforms (EBSCO, OVID) and gray literature databases (Open Grey, Base) were conducted. Studies were screened for inclusion based on predetermined eligibility criteria and quality assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were tabulated and synthesized using thematic synthesis. Results: Our review found people with dementia, their family carers, and healthcare professionals differed in how risk is conceptualized, with views being shaped by media perceptions, personal experiences, socio-cultural influences, dementia knowledge, and dementia severity. We found that mobilization (causing falls inside and getting lost outside) is the most frequently identified risk factor. Our findings show people with dementia are generally risk-tolerant, while healthcare professionals may adopt risk-averse approaches because of organizational requirements. We found factors that disrupt daily routines, living and caring arrangements, medication management, and unclear care pathways contribute toward adverse risk events. We discovered that most studies about risk and risk assessment scales did not consider insight of the person with dementia into risks although this is important for the impact of a risk. No risk instrument identified had sufficient evidence that it was useful. Conclusion: Accurate risk assessment and effective communication strategies that include the perspectives of people with dementia are needed to enable risk-tolerant practice. No risk instrument to date was shown to be widely acceptable and useful in practice.

History

Author affiliation

School of Healthcare, University of Leicester

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

International Psychogeriatrics

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

issn

1041-6102

eissn

1741-203X

Copyright date

2023

Notes

6 month embargo on AAM

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC