University of Leicester
Browse
DSouza2019_Article_RiskFactorsForObstetricAnalSph.pdf (351.24 kB)
Download file

Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal birth after caesarean: a retrospective cohort study.

Download (351.24 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-10-14, 14:55 authored by Joanna C. D'Souza, Ash Monga, Douglas G. Tincello
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is associated with an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). However, specific factors that influence the risk of OASIS at VBAC have not been studied, particularly whether there are specific baseline characteristics of the first delivery which affect the subsequent perineal outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from University of Southampton NHS Foundation Trusts' maternity database. This included secundiparous women with a previous caesarean delivery (CS) who achieved a singleton, term, cephalic vaginal delivery from 2004 to 2014. Univariate analysis compared maternal, intrapartum and neonatal factors of those who suffered OASIS at VBAC with those who did not. A binary logistic regression model calculated the adjusted, independent odds ratio (OR) of OASIS. RESULTS: A total of 1375 women met the inclusion criteria. The OASIS rate was 8.1%, a 1.4-fold increase compared with primiparous women [difference 2.4% (95% CI 1.1, 3.6)]. Those sustaining OASIS at VBAC were older (p = 0.011) and had infants of greater birth weight at initial caesarean (p < 0.001) and VBAC (p = 0.04). Analysis of odds ratios revealed that mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) at VBAC halved the risk of OASIS [37.5% VBAC with OASIS vs. 52.2% VBAC without OASIS (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.81)], whereas an urgent CS at initial delivery doubled the risk [52.3% VBAC with OASIS vs. 34.9% VBAC without OASIS (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31-3.21)]. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced maternal age, increased infant birth weight and an urgent category of initial CS increase the risk of OASIS at VBAC, whereas MLE is protective.

History

Citation

International Urogynecology Journal, 2019

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

International Urogynecology Journal

Publisher

Springer Verlag (Germany) for British Society of Urogynaecology, International Urogynecological Association

eissn

1433-3023

Acceptance date

2019-05-03

Copyright date

2019

Available date

2019-10-14

Publisher version

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-019-03978-x

Language

en