posted on 2018-06-05, 13:40authored byRosie Campbell, Teela Sanders, Jane Scoular, Jane Pitcher, Stewart Cunningham
It has been well established that those working in the sex industry are at various risks of
violence and crime depending on where they sell sex and the environments in which they
work. What sociological research has failed to address is how crime and safety have been
affected by the dynamic changing nature of sex work given the dominance of the internet
and digital technologies, including the development of new markets such as webcamming.
This paper reports the most comprehensive findings on the internet based sex market in the
UK demonstrating types of crimes experienced by internet based sex workers and the
strategies of risk management that sex workers adopt, building on our article in XYZ in 2007.
We present the concept of ‘blended safety repertoires’ to explain how sex workers,
particularly independent escorts, are using a range of traditional techniques alongside
digitally enabled strategies to keep themselves safe. We contribute a deeper understanding
of why sex workers who work indoors rarely report crimes to the police, reflecting the
dilemmas experienced. Our findings highlight how legal and policy changes which seek to
ban online adult services advertising and sex work related content within online spaces
would have direct impact on the safety strategies online sex workers employ and would
further undermine their safety. These findings occur in a context where aspects of sex work
are quasi-criminalised through the brothel keeping legislation. We conclude that the legal
and policy failure to recognise sex work as a form of employment, contributes to the
stigmatisation of sex work and prevents individuals working together. Current UK policy
disallows a framework for employment laws and health and safety standards to regulate sex
work, leaving sex workers in the shadow economy, their safety at risk in a quasi-legal
system.
History
Citation
British Journal of Sociology, 2018
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/Department of Criminology
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
British Journal of Sociology
Publisher
Wiley for London School of Economics and Political Science
The file associated with this record is under embargo until 24 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.