University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

Safety of Preoperative Use of Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin Compared With Aspirin Alone in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Download (250.06 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-11-08, 15:42 authored by R. Gherli, Giovanni Mariscalco, M. Dalén, F. Onorati, A. Perrotti, S. Chocron, J. P. Verhoye, H. Gulbins, D. Reichart, P. Svenarud, G. Faggian, G. Santarpino, T. Fischlein, D. Maselli, C. Dominici, F. Musumeci, A. S. Rubino, C. Mignosa, M. De Feo, C. Bancone, G. Gatti, L. Maschietto, F. Santini, F. Nicolini, T. Gherli, M. Zanobini, E. M. Kinnunen, V. G. Ruggieri, S. Rosato, F. Biancari
Importance: The optimal timing of discontinuation of ticagrelor before cardiac surgery is controversial. Objective: To evaluate the safety of preoperative use of ticagrelor with or without aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with aspirin alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multicenter clinical trial was performed at 15 European centers of cardiac surgery. Participants were patients with ACS undergoing isolated CABG from the European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (E-CABG) registry between January and September 2015. Exposures: Before surgery, patients received ticagrelor with or without aspirin or aspirin alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Severe bleeding as defined by the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding (UDPB) and E-CABG bleeding classification criteria. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to adjust for differences in baseline and operative covariates. Results: Of 2482 patients from the E-CABG registry, the study cohort included 786 (31.7%) consecutive patients with ACS (mean [SD] age, 67.1 [9.3] years; range, 32-88 years), and 132 (16.8%) were female. One-to-one propensity score matching provided 215 pairs, whose baseline and operative covariates had a standardized difference of less than 10%. Preoperative use of ticagrelor was associated with a similar risk of bleeding according to the UDPB and E-CABG bleeding classifications, but the incidence of platelet transfusion was higher in the ticagrelor group (13.5% [29 of 215] vs 6.0% [13 of 215]. Compared with those receiving aspirin alone, continuing ticagrelor up to the time of surgery or discontinuing its use less than 2 days before surgery was associated with a higher risk of platelet transfusion (22.7% [5 of 22] vs 6.4% [12 of 187]) and E-CABG bleeding grades 2 and 3 (18.2% [4 of 22] vs 5.9% [11 of 187]) and tended to have an increased risk of UDPB grades 3 and 4 (22.7% [5 of 22] vs 9.6% [18 of 187]). Among patients in whom antiplatelet drug use was discontinued at least 2 days before surgery, the incidence of platelet transfusion was 12.4% (24 of 193) in the ticagrelor group and 3.6% (1 of 28) in the aspirin-alone group. Conclusions and Relevance: In propensity score-matched analyses among patients with ACS undergoing CABG, the use of preoperative ticagrelor with or without aspirin compared with aspirin alone was associated with more platelet transfusion but similar degree of bleeding; in patients receiving ticagrelor 1 day before or up until surgery, there was an increased rate of severe bleeding.

History

Citation

JAMA Cardiology, 2016

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Cardiovascular Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

JAMA Cardiology

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

issn

2380-6583

eissn

2380-6591

Acceptance date

2016-07-13

Available date

2017-09-21

Publisher version

http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2553882

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC