posted on 2019-04-26, 11:18authored byF Fitzpatrick, C Tarrant, V Hamilton, FM Kiernan, D Jenkins, E Krockow
Sepsis and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes co-exist in healthcare settings;
however, there can be tension between the goals of reducing sepsis mortality, and preventing
antimicrobial resistance (AMR). How these goals are perceived and prioritised by health
professionals and the public is likely shaped by media framing and compounded by nonalignment of sepsis and AMS programmes in healthcare organisations. Media sepsis reports use
personal stories with solutions within the power of individuals whereas AMR is framed as a
vague future threat involving multiple actors, with solutions requiring global efforts and policy
change. Principles from behavioural economics could help to achieve a ‘recognition of necessity’
to change prescribing approaches. Importantly sepsis and AMS cannot be discussed in isolation,
but should be portrayed as two sides of the same coin: in the framing of messages in the media
and public health campaigns, and the alignment of organisational sepsis and AMS programmes.
Funding
EK and CT were funded by the Global Challenges Research
Fund—Grant No. ES/P004784/1 awarded by the Economic and
Social Research Council (ESRC) on behalf of the Research
Councils UK (RCUK).
History
Citation
BMJ Quality & Safety 2019;28:758-761.
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences