University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

Similarity between Referents Constrains the Processing of Contrastive Focus during Reading

Download (101.4 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-07-10, 15:22 authored by Shuang Chen, Yuqing Tang, Xiuna Lv, Kevin Paterson, Lijing Chen
Contrastive focus implies a contrast between two elements. However, it is unclear whether and how any interplay between such a contrast and similarity between potentially contrasting elements might affect focus processing. Accordingly, we report an eye movement experiment investigating this issue. The experiment used a background story to introduce eight characters whose social identities were manipulated to be similar or dissimilar. Participants first read this background story, then a series of two-sentence discourses while their eye movements were recorded. Each discourse referred to two characters from the passage who had either similar or dissimilar identities, with one (the target character) either focused using the Chinese particle zhiyou (meaning only) or unfocused. The results showed a typical focus facilitation effect, such that target character names were processed more quickly when focused than unfocused. We also observed a main effect of the similarity / dissimilarly of characters and, crucially, an interaction between this variable and focus. This interaction was due to slower processing of a post-target region when the target character was focused and the two characters had similar rather than dissimilar identities, but no such effect when the target character was unfocused. The findings suggest that establishing a contrast between referents is effortful during reading when these have similar rather than dissimilar social identities and so are more difficult to differentiate. The distinctiveness of referents in a discourse context may therefore constrain the establishment of contrastive focus during reading. We discuss these findings in relation to current theories of focus interpretation.

History

Citation

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820945208

Author affiliation

Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Publisher

SAGE Publications

eissn

1747-0226

Acceptance date

2020-07-07

Copyright date

2020

Available date

2020-07-20

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC