posted on 2015-02-18, 15:11authored byStephen Hopkins
This article examines a critical aspect of the contemporary political debate in
Northern Ireland regarding ‘the past’, and how to deal with the legacies of violent conflict.
The article will specifically analyse the Provisional republican movement’s developing policy
in this area. It outlines Sinn Féin’s (SF’s) policy evolution with regard to ideas of ‘truth and
reconciliation’ in the context of the post-Belfast Agreement era of ‘peace’. It proceeds to
critically assess the Republican movement’s demands for an independent and international
process of ‘truth recovery’, and subsequently engages in a detailed critique of SF’s recent
promotion of a ‘reconciliation strategy’, designed to enhance the movement’s strategic
agenda, and usher in a new phase in the ‘peace process’. The article concludes by arguing
that SF’s approach to ‘truth and reconciliation’ has been characterised by an emphasis upon
the movement’s efforts to legitimise its version of the historical narrative of the Troubles,
rather than by any authentic attempt to address self-critically the previous commitment to
‘armed struggle’, or to seek genuine compromise with unionists, loyalists and the broader
Protestant population. This approach has also been formulated for an internal audience, with
the goal of convincing republicans that progress towards a united Ireland has not stalled.
History
Citation
Irish Political Studies, 2015, 30 (1), pp. 79-97 (19)
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE/Department of Politics and International Relations
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
Irish Political Studies
Publisher
Taylor & Francis (Routledge) for Political Studies Association of Ireland (PSAI)