University of Leicester
Browse

Some Reflections on Critical-text editing: the case of Hobbes's Leviathan

Download (490.87 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-09-04, 13:42 authored by Ian Harris
[First paragraph] ‘Is your edition really necessary?’ is one of those questions which are so searching that they are rarely asked in polite intellectual society. It comes from the best of sources,1 and it is important not least because it raises fundamental questions—about why editing of a certain sort is necessary and about the criteria according to which it is carried out. Why, indeed, should anyone undertake critical editing? These questions can be addressed in several ways. This article addresses them by way of considering an edition which, it will be seen, is necessary.2 For Noel Malcolm’s is the first successful attempt to produce a critical-text edition of Leviathan. Here the reader is offered gold rather than base metal, and in considering such work it cannot be out of the way to ask the questions, both particular and general, that arise from reflecting on it. Neither can it be untimely to do so just now, when textual scholars in the West are becoming more conscious of the basic fact that their practices are not the only ones.

History

Citation

Locke Studies, 2016, 16, pp. 215-271 (56)

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/School of History

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Locke Studies

Publisher

Locke Studies

Acceptance date

2017-06-19

Copyright date

2016

Available date

2017-09-04

Publisher version

http://www.lockestudies.org/

Notes

Archived with written permission from the editor.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC