University of Leicester
Browse

Standardising the measurement of physical activity in people receiving haemodialysis: considerations for research and practice.

Download (766.9 kB)
Version 2 2020-03-23, 12:40
Version 1 2020-03-23, 12:37
journal contribution
posted on 2020-03-23, 12:40 authored by Hannah ML Young, Mark W Orme, Yan Song, Maurice Dungey, James O Burton, Alice C Smith, Sally J Singh
BACKGROUND:Physical activity (PA) is exceptionally low amongst the haemodialysis (HD) population, and physical inactivity is a powerful predictor of mortality, making it a prime focus for intervention. Objective measurement of PA using accelerometers is increasing, but standard reporting guidelines essential to effectively evaluate, compare and synthesise the effects of PA interventions are lacking. This study aims to (i) determine the measurement and processing guidance required to ensure representative PA data amongst a diverse HD population, and; (ii) to assess adherence to PA monitor wear amongst HD patients. METHODS:Clinically stable HD patients from the UK and China wore a SenseWear Armband accelerometer for 7 days. Step count between days (HD, Weekday, Weekend) were compared using repeated measures ANCOVA. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) determined reliability (≥0.80 acceptable). Spearman-Brown prophecy formula, in conjunction with a priori ≥  80% sample size retention, identified the minimum number of days required for representative PA data. RESULTS:Seventy-seven patients (64% men, mean ± SD age 56 ± 14 years, median (interquartile range) time on HD 40 (19-72) months, 40% Chinese, 60% British) participated. Participants took fewer steps on HD days compared with non-HD weekdays and weekend days (3402 [95% CI 2665-4140], 4914 [95% CI 3940-5887], 4633 [95% CI 3558-5707] steps/day, respectively, p < 0.001). PA on HD days were less variable than non-HD days, (ICC 0.723-0.839 versus 0.559-0.611) with ≥ 1 HD day and ≥  3 non-HD days required to provide representative data. Using these criteria, the most stringent wear-time retaining ≥ 80% of the sample was ≥7 h. CONCLUSIONS:At group level, a wear-time of ≥7 h on ≥1HD day and ≥ 3 non-HD days is required to provide reliable PA data whilst retaining an acceptable sample size. PA is low across both HD and non- HD days and future research should focus on interventions designed to increase physical activity in both the intra and interdialytic period.

Funding

The research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands (CLAHRC EM) and partly funded by the Stoneygate Trust. H.M.L.Y. and J.O.B. are supported by grants from the NIHR (DRF-2016-09-015 and CS-2013-13-014). S.J.S. is supported by the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands.

History

Citation

Young, H.M.L., Orme, M.W., Song, Y. et al. Standardising the measurement of physical activity in people receiving haemodialysis: considerations for research and practice. BMC Nephrol 20, 450 (2019)

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMC nephrology

Volume

20

Issue

1

Pagination

450

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

issn

1471-2369

eissn

1471-2369

Acceptance date

2019-11-20

Copyright date

2019

Available date

2019-12-04

Publisher version

https://bmcnephrol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12882-019-1634-1

Spatial coverage

England

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC