Surrogacy, Pregnancy and Maternity Rights: a Missed Oppoertunity for a More Coherent Regime of Parental Rights in the EU?
journal contribution
posted on 2015-10-27, 13:16authored byEugenia Caracciolo di Torella
Over the years, the EU has been successful in creating a framework where pregnancy and
maternity in the workplace are acknowledged and protected. Such
a framework, however,
fails to regulate situations such as
surrogacy
. The latter raises complex ethical a
nd legal
issues that have been addressed in very different ways at national level. Lack of a common
position has meant that the rights that women have in to relation
to surrogacy
in the
workplace
have
been ignored at EU level. This article maintains that one of the main
difficulties in addressing it is the traditional understanding of who is perceived to be a
mother. Women are de facto afforded rights because they are biological mothers and this
excludes surrogacy. The debate has
recently been highlighted by the decisions of
the Court of Justice of the European Union in the cases of
C.D. v S.T.
and Z v Government Department and
the Board of Management of a Community School.
Interestingly, the two
Advocates General
reached different conclusions,
one emphasising health and safety and the other the equality
aspect of the debate: neither of these opinions offered a clear solution, yet both indicate
possible ways
forward
.
The Court ignored these suggestions and reached disappointing,
albeit
technically flawless and entirely predictable, decisions. Against this background, this
article
argues
that the time is now ripe for a more coherent regime of parental rights in the
EU where the focus should shift from the mere biological
/gestational
connotation of
motherhood
to emphasising
the
different sides
of
“being a mother”, and more generally
“being a parent”, including a caring relationship between the parent(s)
and
the
child
.
Accordingly, it concludes that the
EU is
in urgent need of a complete set of legal rules that
looks beyond how
families are constructed
and, ultimately, values and
promotes the role of
care and, ultimately,
the best interests of the child.
History
Citation
European Law Review , 2015, 40 (1), pp. 52-69 (18)
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/School of Law
The file associated with this record is under a permanent embargo in accordance with the publisher's policy, available at http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/terms/journals-access-policy.htm