University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

Suspected Dementia in Young Adults: Cognitive Screening Tools for Use in Primary Care

Download (154.05 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2022-06-15, 10:16 authored by Elizabeta B Mukaetova-Ladinska, Shahbaz Abdullah, Mathew Critchfield, John Maltby
Background: Memory complaints are frequent among young adults presenting in general practice. Many of them will have reversable, functional cognitive impairment that can easily be mistaken for dementia. Its accurate and timely identification is warranted to prevent further escalation to overt dementia syndrome. Objective: To evaluate the recommended primary care screening cognitive tools for dementia for use in younger people. Methods: 2.5 years clinical data were collected during the course of ongoing patient care for all assessed face-to-face patients in a secondary care memory service for younger adults. Cognitive screening and assessment tests used in primary [General Practice Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG)] and secondary [Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS), Salzburg Dementia Test Prediction (SDTP)] care were analyzed for their accuracy to identify dementia and memory complaints. Area under the curve in receiver operating characteristic curves was used to measure predictive value of tests for a clinical diagnosis of dementia. Results: 348 young adults were assessed for cognitive impairment. Following comprehensive Memory Clinic assessments, 241 (69.25%) were diagnosed with memory complaints in the absence of relevant neuropathology and 107 with dementia. GPCOG, especially the informant part, and RUDAS had low accuracy to identify dementia (AUC=0.465 and AUC=0.698, respectively). In contrast, ACE-III and SDTP demonstrated the highest accuracy (AUC=0.799 and AUC=0.809/0.817, respectively). Conclusion: Dementia screening in younger people will benefit from SDTP incorporated as part of the screening cognitive toolset. The national guidance on dementia screening tools, diagnostic pathways, and management should also refer to younger adults.

History

Citation

Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 333-341, 2022

Author affiliation

Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, College of Life Sciences

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Volume

86

Issue

1

Pagination

333 - 341 (9)

Publisher

IOS PRESS

issn

1387-2877

eissn

1875-8908

Acceptance date

2021-12-14

Copyright date

2022

Available date

2022-06-15

Spatial coverage

Netherlands

Language

English