posted on 2015-12-17, 11:57authored byCharlotte Crotty, Yasmin Tabbakh, Sarah A. Hosgood, Michael L. Nicholson
Introduction. Systemic heparinisation is advocated during laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN) as a preventative measure against renal vascular thrombosis during the warm ischaemic interval. This study compares the outcome with and without the administration of systemic heparinisation. Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on 186 consecutive LDN patients between April 2008 and November 2012. Systemic heparin (2000β3000βIU) was administered intravenously to donors (hep n=109). From January 2010, heparin was not used systemically in this group of LDN (no hep n=77). Outcome measures included donor and recipient complications, initial graft function, and 12 month graft survival. Results. The demographics of both heparinised and non-heparinised donors were similar. The warm ischaemic time (WIT) was comparable in both groups (WIT; hep 5Β±3 versus
no hep 5Β±3 minutes; π = 1.000). There was no difference in complication rates, no episodes of graft thrombosis, and no incidences of primary nonfunction in either group. Delayed graft function occurred in 4/109 and 1/77 (3.6% versus 1.2%; ; π = 0.405) and there was no significant difference in graft survival (π = 0.650). Conclusion. Omitting systemic heparinisation during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a feasible and safe approach that does not compromise donor or recipient outcome.
History
Citation
Journal of Transplantation Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 138926, 5 pages
This study was presented at the Association of Surgeons
of Great Britain and Ireland (ASGBI) in May 2013 and at
the European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) in
September 2013. βIs systemic heparinisation necessary during
laparoscopic donor nephrectomies?β