posted on 2017-11-21, 10:20authored byAndrew M. Colman, Natalie Gold
In many everyday activities, individuals have a common interest in coordinating their actions. Orthodox game theory cannot explain such intuitively obvious forms of coordination as the selection of an outcome that is best for all in a common-interest game. Theories of team reasoning provide a convincing solution by proposing that people are sometimes motivated to maximize the collective payoff of a group and that they adopt a distinctive mode of reasoning from preferences to decisions. This also offers a compelling explanation of cooperation in social dilemmas. A review of team reasoning and related theories suggests how team reasoning could be incorporated into psychological theories of group identification and social value orientation theory to provide a deeper understanding of these phenomena.
Funding
Preparation of this article was supported by an award to the first author from the Leicester Judgment and Decision Making Endowment Fund (Grant RM43G0176) and to the second author by funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement 283849.
History
Citation
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2017
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/MBSP Non-Medical Departments/Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour