The UK national media framed the riot in the Stokes Croft area of Bristol on 21 April
2011 as a manifestation of the local campaign against the opening of a Tesco
supermarket in Cheltenham Road, an arterial route through the area. New media
technologies enabled alternative perspectives on these events to emerge that not only
rejected this link, but also criticised the ‘heavy-handed’ policing operation in the
Telepathic Heights squat to remove petrol bombs that were allegedly being prepared
for use against the supermarket. This project set out to examine whether the use of
Youtube to share acts of ‘inverse surveillance’ elicited support for the viewpoints of
local residents that had been largely absent from the media coverage of the
disturbances. This case study will be used to explore the ethical dilemmas that arise
from the analysis and presentation of user-generated content in academic publications.
The strict ethical stance adopted for this project, which through the decision not to
directly quote participants went far beyond conventional approaches towards the
removal of Personally Identifiable Information, will be elucidated with a view to
identifying best practice for the analysis of Youtube comments.
History
Citation
SAGE Cases in Methodology
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE/Department of Media and Communication