The Effects of Healthy Ageing on Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Cognitive Testing.
journal contributionposted on 2019-03-15, 12:33 authored by L Beishon, JS Minhas, K Patrick, I Shanmugam, CAL Williams, RB Panerai, TG Robinson, VJ Haunton
Background Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography (TCD) can be utilised to measure the tight coupling of cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFv) in response to cognitive demand by task activation, termed neurovascular coupling. AIMS: To investigate the differences in neurovascular coupling between healthy older (>50 years) and younger (18-49 years) adults in response to cognitive testing. METHODS: Fifty-four older (n=25) and younger (n=29) adults underwent continuous bilateral TCD, beat-to-beat blood pressure (MAP; Finapres), heart rate (HR; electrocardiogram), and end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2; capnography) monitoring. After a 5-min baseline period, memory (M1-4: recalling three learnt words, learning a name and address, recalling US presidents and UK prime ministers, and recalling the previously learnt name and address) and visuospatial (V1-4: drawing a cube and infinity diagram, drawing a clock face, counting dots, and recognising obscured letters) tasks from the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) were performed. Data are mean (standard deviation). RESULTS: In the memory paradigms, peak percentage change in CBFv differed significantly between younger and older groups only in the dominant hemisphere during the M1 task, (2.17 (9.16)% vs. 8.38 (9.27)%, respectively, p=0.017). In the visuospatial paradigm, there were also significant differences in peak percentage change in CBFv between younger and older groups in the V1 (5.87 (8.32)% vs. 11.89 (6.60)%, p=0.005) and V2 tasks (6.30 (8.72)% vs. 11.30 (7.77)%, p=0.032). Conclusions Healthy older adults demonstrate augmented cerebrovascular physiology in response to cognitive challenge compared to younger adults. The impact of abnormal ageing on cerebrovascular physiology, for example related to cognitively impaired states, requires further investigation.
CitationCurrent Aging Science, 2019, 11: 1.
Author affiliation/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Cardiovascular Sciences
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)