University of Leicester
Browse

The Gap between Public Preferences and Policies on Immigration: A Comparative Examination of the Effect of Politicisation on Policy Congruence

Download (689.93 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-04-08, 09:16 authored by Laura Morales, J-B. Pilet, D. Ruedin
The existence of a gap between public preferences for more restrictive immigration policies and relatively expansive immigration policy in Western democracies has received considerable attention. Sometimes, this gap has been explained by the nature of immigration policies: dominated by elites while the public remained uninterested. In many countries, however, immigration has gained considerable salience among the public. There are competing expectations and accounts relating to whether policy-makers ignore or follow public demands on immigration. In this article we examine the potential drivers of variations in the opinion–policy gap on immigration in seven countries (1995–2010). We analyse the effect of the politicisation of immigration on this opinion–policy gap. The strength of anti-immigrant parties is unrelated to the opinion–policy gap on immigration. The salience of the issue and the intensity of the public debate are associated with the opinion–policy gap, and the combination of negative attitudes with extensive media coverage seems particularly conducive to policy congruence.

History

Citation

Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2015

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE/Department of Politics and International Relations

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

Publisher

Taylor & Francis (Routledge) for Centre for European Migration and Ethnic Studies (CEMES) and Sussex Centre for Migration Research at the University of Sussex

issn

1369-183X

eissn

1469-9451

Copyright date

2015

Available date

2016-09-27

Publisher version

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1021598

Notes

The underlying research materials for this article can be accessed at http://dx.doi.org/ 10.7910/DVN/27517

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC