The National Institute for Health Research Hyperacute Stroke Research Centres and the ENCHANTED trial: the impact of enhanced research infrastructure on trial metrics and patient outcomes.
posted on 2019-09-10, 13:29authored byTG Robinson, X Wang, AC Durham, GA Ford, J Liao, S Littlewood, C Roffe, P White, J Chalmers, CS Anderson, ENCHANTED Investigators
BACKGROUND: The English National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network first established Hyperacute Stroke Research Centres (HSRCs) in 2010 to support multicentre hyperacute (< 9 h) and complex stroke research. We assessed the impact of this investment on research performance and patient outcomes in a post-hoc analysis of country-specific data from a large multicentre clinical trial. METHODS: Comparisons of baseline, outcome and trial metric data were made for participants recruited to the alteplase-dose arm of the international Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke study (ENCHANTED) at National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network HSRCs and non-HSRCs between June 2012 and October 2015. RESULTS: Among 774 ENCHANTED United Kingdom participants (41% female; mean age 72 years), 502 (64.9%) were recruited from nine HSRCs and 272 (35.1%) from 24 non-HSRCs. HSRCs had higher monthly recruitment rates (median 1.5, interquartile interval 1.4-2.2 vs. 0.7, 0.5-1.3; p = 0.01) and shorter randomisation-to-treatment times (2.6 vs. 3.1 min; p = 0.01) compared to non-HSRCs. HSRC participants were younger and had milder stroke severity, but clinically important between-group differences in 90-day death or disability outcomes remained after adjustment for minimisation criteria and important baseline variables at randomisation, whether defined by ordinal modified Rankin scale score shift (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.62-1.08; p = 0.15), scores 2 to 6 (adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.50-1.01; p = 0.05), or scores 3 to 6 (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.57-1.17; p = 0.27). There was no significant difference in symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, nor heterogeneity in the comparative treatment effects between low- and standard-dose alteplase by HSRCs or non-HSRCs. CONCLUSIONS: Infrastructure investment in HSRCs was associated with improved research performance metrics, particularly recruitment and time to treatment with clinically important, though not statistically significant, improvements in patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Unique identifier: NCT01422616 .
Funding
The study is supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia, the Stroke Association of the United Kingdom, the Ministry of Health and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPQ: 467322/2014–7, 402388/2013–5), and the Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs of the Republic of Korea (HI14C1985).
History
Citation
Health Research Policy and Systems, 2019, 17, Article number: 19
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Cardiovascular Sciences
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems
Publisher
BMC (part of Springer Nature), World Health Organization (WHO)
The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Additional files at version of record:
Additional file 1: Imaging transfer and analysis, and definitions of
symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage. (DOCX 40 kb)
Additional file 2: Table S1. Use of alteplase and management details
from randomisation to day 7 by hyperacute stroke research centres
(HSRCs) and non-HSRCs. Table S2. Key secondary outcome of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage across all definitions by HSRCs and nonHSRCs. Table S3. Key efficacy outcomes by randomised treatment and
HSRCs and non-HSRCs. Table S4. Key efficacy outcomes by randomised
treatment and HSRCs and non-HSRCs. Table S5. Key safety outcome of
symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage by randomised treatment and
HSRCs and non-HSRCs. (DOCX 49 kb)