University of Leicester
Browse

The Social Media Political Subject Is an Infant

Download (54.23 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-03-31, 13:38 authored by Athina Karatzogianni
Any random sampling of a Facebook timeline or Twitter feed, to take the obvious examples, provides a prepackaged view of global politics. It is restrictive because we choose it to reflect our own pet subjects, groups, likes, and world interests. The lens is prejudiced to reflect our race, class, gender, sexuality, ideology, and affective positionality. We enter a social media world as many as 10 or 50 times a day that has ourselves as the center of the universe. This communication world is similar to an infant’s world: Someone else decides what we can see, what we can consume, what is that extra treat we can earn, if we are good: in social media terms, if we pay for it by reputational capital, or simply, if we spend enough money.

Funding

The author wishes to acknowledge the Economic and Social Research Council (UK) for support [The Common Good: Ethics and Rights in Cyber Security, Grant Ref: ES/L013177/1]

History

Citation

Social Media and Society, April-June 2015 vol. 1 no. 1 2056305115580480

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/Department of Media and Communication

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Social Media and Society

Publisher

SAGE Publications (UK and US)

eissn

2056-3051

Acceptance date

2015-03-31

Available date

2016-03-31

Publisher version

http://sms.sagepub.com/content/1/1/2056305115580480

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC