posted on 2016-03-31, 13:38authored byAthina Karatzogianni
Any random sampling of a Facebook timeline or Twitter feed, to take the obvious examples, provides a prepackaged view of global politics. It is restrictive because we choose it to reflect our own pet subjects, groups, likes, and world interests. The lens is prejudiced to reflect our race, class, gender, sexuality, ideology, and affective positionality. We enter a social media world as many as 10 or 50 times a day that has ourselves as the center of the universe. This communication world is similar to an infant’s world: Someone else decides what we can see, what we can consume, what is that extra treat we can earn, if we are good: in social media terms, if we pay for it by reputational capital, or simply, if we spend enough money.
Funding
The
author wishes to acknowledge the Economic and Social Research
Council (UK) for support [The Common Good: Ethics and Rights
in Cyber Security, Grant Ref: ES/L013177/1]
History
Citation
Social Media and Society, April-June 2015 vol. 1 no. 1 2056305115580480
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/Department of Media and Communication