There is a persistent view in criticism which characterizes satirical discourse in
Middle English as profoundly conservative. It is routinely asserted that satirical discourse
was capable only of simple moral pronouncements, and that it was predisposed to champion
the ideals and conventions it drew upon. The article challenges this conception. It
revisits some of the earliest examples of satire in English to counter such a view, paying
particular attention to the texts collected in Jesus College MS 29, and the Harley MSS
913 and 2253. Through examining these sources, a range of more scurrilous and defamatory
devices are identified. Far from being inflexibly censorious, satire is found to
have a strong element of deprecation and deflation in its arsenal of techniques. The article
also reviews existing scholarship on medieval vernacular satire to suggest how existing
conceptions of the literature may be refined, to reflect the findings it reaches.
History
Citation
Comitatus, 2008, 39, pp. 113-135
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF ARTS, HUMANITIES AND LAW/School of English