University of Leicester
i1552-5783-55-1-451.pdf (648.9 kB)

The effect of font size on reading performance in strabismic amblyopia: an eye movement investigation.

Download (648.9 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-12-16, 14:19 authored by Evgenia Kanonidou, Irene Gottlob, Frank A. Proudlock
PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of font size on reading speed and ocular motor performance in strabismic amblyopes during text reading under monocular and binocular viewing conditions. METHODS: Eye movements were recorded at 250 Hz using a head-mounted infrared video eye tracker in 15 strabismic amblyopes and 18 age-matched controls while silently reading paragraphs of text at font sizes equivalent to 1.0 to 0.2 logMAR acuity. Reading under monocular viewing with amblyopic eye/nondominant eye and nonamblyopic/dominant eye was compared to binocular viewing. Mean reading speed; number, amplitude, and direction of saccades; and fixation duration were calculated for each font size and viewing condition. RESULTS: Reading speed was significantly slower in amblyopes compared to controls for all font sizes during monocular reading with the amblyopic eye (P = 0.004), but only for smaller font sizes for reading with the nonamblyopic eye (P = 0.045) and binocularly (P = 0.038). The most significant ocular motor change was that strabismic amblyopes made more saccades per line than controls irrespective of font size and viewing conditions (P < 0.05 for all). There was no significant difference in saccadic amplitudes and fixation duration was only significantly longer in strabismic amblyopes when reading smaller fonts with the amblyopic eye viewing. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular motor deficits exist in strabismic amblyopes during reading even when reading speeds are normal and when visual acuity is not a limiting factor; that is, when reading larger font sizes with nonamblyopic eye viewing and binocular viewing. This suggests that these abnormalities are not related to crowding.


Supported by Ulverscroft Foundation.



Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2014, 55 (1), pp. 451-459

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/MBSP Non-Medical Departments/Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour


  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science


Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)





Acceptance date


Available date


Publisher version